![[feed]](/style/images/feed-icon-14x14.png){kind=icon}
Tools
Tools
![[thumbnail of 8547oa.pdf]](https://mdc-test.eprints-hosting.org/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
521kB |
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Management of high-risk patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy in Germany: differences between cardiac specialists in the inpatient and outpatient setting |
| Creators Name: | Voeller, H., Sonntag, F., Thierry, J., Wegscheider, K., Luft, F.C. and Bestehorn, K. |
| Abstract: | BACKGROUND: Among patients with hypertension, those with established left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) represent a high risk cohort with poor prognosis. We aimed to investigate differences in characteristics and health care management of such patients treated as inpatients or outpatients by cardiac specialists. METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional study in patients with hypertension and LVH who were referred to either inpatient care (rehabilitation hospitals) or to outpatient care (cardiology practices). RESULTS: A total of 6358 inpatients (59.6% males; mean age 66.6 years) and 2246 outpatients (59.5% males; mean age 63.2 years) were followed up for a mean of 23 vs. 52 days, respectively. Inpatients compared to outpatients had a significantly higher prevalence of coronary heart disease, history of stroke, renal failure or diabetes. Mean blood pressure of inpatients compared to outpatients was significantly lower both at entry (150/84 vs. 161/93 mmHg) and at end of follow-up (129/75 vs. 139/83 mmHg). After adjustment for baseline blood pressure and a propensity score, differences between out- and inpatients at end of follow-up were 8.0/5.1 mmHg in favour of inpatients. Blood pressure goals as specified by guidelines were not met by 32% of inpatients and 55% of outpatients. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatients had a higher rate of comorbidities and more advanced atherosclerotic disease than outpatients. Control of hypertension of inpatients was already better on admission than in outpatients, and treatment intensity in this group was also higher during the observation period. While blood pressure lowering was substantial in both groups, there were still a high proportion of patients who did not achieve treatment goals at discharge. |
| Keywords: | Ambulatory Care Facilities, Blood Pressure Determination, Cardiology, Comorbidity, Guideline Adherence, Hypertension, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, Outcome Assessment, Prospective Studies, Prognosis, Rehabilitation Centers, Risk Factors |
| Source: | BMC Public Health |
| ISSN: | 1471-2458 |
| Publisher: | BioMed Central |
| Volume: | 6 |
| Page Range: | 256 |
| Date: | 19 October 2006 |
| Official Publication: | https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-256 |
| PubMed: | View item in PubMed |
Repository Staff Only: item control page
